Morpho-Physiological Response of Selected Sri Lankan Mungbean (VignaradiataL.) Genotypes to Drought Stress

Authors

  • DISNA PIUMRAVINI RATNASEKERA Department of Agric. Biology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna
  • AP THARANGANIE SUBHASHI

Abstract

Mung bean, from family Fabaceae is grown in most tropical and sub-tropical regions of world and have significant role in nutrition at developing countries. Water is the most critical constrain in most tropics and sub-tropics thus our study aimed to investigate resistance of widely cultivated mung bean genotypes of Sri Lanka ARI, MI -5and MI-6 and its morpho-physiological responses to drought stress during vegetative and reproductive growth stages. A greenhouse pot experiment was carried out under randomized complete block design with five replications and relative water content of leaves, soil moisture content, plant dry matter, leaf area and grain yield and yield components were measured. Results showed that there was no significant difference between control and drought stress during reproductive growth stage on yield and yield components, but drought stress during vegetative growth stage decreased yield and yield components significantly. The genotype and growth stage both had a significant effect on leaf area and plant dry weight at vegetative stage. However, results obtained showed that difference between each three treatments on relative water content (RWC) and soil moisture content (SMC) was significant.

Author Biography

DISNA PIUMRAVINI RATNASEKERA, Department of Agric. Biology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna

Senior Lecturer, Department of Agric. Biology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ruhuna

References

Abdel CG, Thahir and Al-Rawi IM. 2011. Response of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.,) to gibberellic acid (GA3) rates and varying irrigation frequencies. International Journal of Bio sciences 3:85-92.

Allahmoradi P, Ghobadi M, Taherabadi S and Aherabadi S. 2011. Physiological aspects of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) in response to drought stress. Intl Conf Food Engg Biotechnol, IPCBEE 9, IACSIT Press, Singapore.

Asaduzzaman FK, Ullah J and Hasanuzzaman M. 2008. Response of mung bean (Vigna radiate L.) to nitrogen and irrigation management. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research 3:40-43.

Boutraa T, Iqbal MJ and Sanders FE. 1999. Can we improve the tolerance of Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars to low soil phosphorus by selecting for greater root biomass. J. Experimental Bot. 4:4-39.

Castillo FJ. 1996. Anti-oxidative protection in the inducible CAM plant Sedum album L. following the imposition of severe water stress and recovery. Oecologia 107: 469–477.

Chaudhary TN, Chopra UK and Sinha AK. 1985. Root growth, leaf water potential and yield of irrigated summer mung bean (Phaseolus aureus ROXB.) in relation to soil water status and soil temperature under various mulches. Field Crops Research 11:325-333.

Chiang MY and Hubbel JN.1978. Effect of irrigation on mung bean yield. In: Proc First Intl Mung bean Symp, AVRDC, Shanhua, Taiwan pp 93-96.

De Costa WA, Shanmugathasa KN and Joseph KD. 1999. Physiology of yield determination of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) under various irrigation regimes in the dry and intermediate zones of Sri Lanka. Field Crop Res. 61: 1-12.

Eack HV. 1996. Effect of water deficit on yield and yield components and water use efficiency of irrigated corn. Agronomy Journal 78: 1083-1089

Kramer PJ and Boyer JS. 1997. Water relations of Plants and Soils, Academic Press, San DiagoArrese, I., Gonzalez, E.M., Mariano, D.,Landera, R.,Larraiza, E., Gil-Quintana, E.,(2009), Physiological response oflegume nodules to drought, Plant stress, Global Science book, vol. 5, pp.24-31.

Kumar A and Sharma KD.2009. Physiological response and dry matter partitioning of summer mung bean (Vigna radiate L.) genotypes subjected to drought conditions. J Agron Crop Sci. 95:270-277

Maqsood M, Rahman S and Islam A 2000. Effect of soil moisture stress on growth and yield of summer mung bean. Asian J. Plant Sci. 33(8): 250-258.

Miah MZI, and Carangal VR 2001. Yield of 10 mung bean cultivars evaluated in intensive rice based cropping system. Intl. Rice Res. Newsl. 6(4): 27.

Rafiei SM and Asgharipur MR 2009. Yield reaction and morphological characteristics of some mung bean genotypes to drought stress. J Modern Agr Knowledge 5(15): 67-76.

Sangakkaran UR, Frehner M and Nosberger J 2000. Effect of soil moisture and potassium fertilizer on shoot water potential, photosynthesis and partitioning of carbon in mung bean and cowpea. J Agron Crop Sci. 185: 201-207.

Singh AK, Kumar P and N Chandra. 2013. Studies on yield production of mung bean (Vigna radiate) sown at different dates. J. Environ. Biol. 34: 1007-1011.

Srikrishnah S and Mahendran S. 2007. The effects of soil moisture stress on the leaf water potential and yield of mung bean var. MI-6 at different growth stages. Sri Lanka Assoc Adv Sci Proc 63rd Annu Session.

Weinberger K. 2003. Impact analysis of mung bean research in South and Southeast Asia. Final report of GTZ Project. The World Vegetable Center (AVRDC), Shanhua, Taiwan.

Downloads

Published

2015-09-01