A participatory approach to identify and address key constraints in Odisha agriculture sector

Participatory identification of agricultural constraints in Odisha

Authors

  • SAHEB PAL ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Hazaribagh, Jharkhand, India-825405
  • SOUMYA MOHAPATRA ICAR-Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology, Ludhiana, Punjab, India-141004
  • TANUSHREE SAHOO ICAR-IIHR, Central Horticultural Experiment Station, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India- 751019
  • KISHORE CHANDRA SAHOO ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Gogamukh, Lakhimpur, Assam, India-787034
  • PRAMOD SHELAKE ICAR-National Research Centre for Banana, Tiruchirapalli, Tamil Nadu, India-620102
  • KAILASHPATI TRIPATHI ICAR-National Research Centre on Seed Spices, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India-305006
  • SWARAJLAXMI NAYAK ICAR-Directorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, Anand, Gujarat-387310

Keywords:

Focused Group Discussion, Key Informants, Problem Identification and Prioritization, Rank Based Quotient, Value Based Index, Problem-Solution Tree

Abstract

India is predominantly an agrarian country where the agriculture sector contributes around 18.3% of the total GDP. However, India’s agricultural productivity is lagging the developed countries. This is mainly attributed to the occurrence of several biotic and abiotic stresses and policy-related problems. Prioritisation of these problems helps to minimise these problems through research and government intervention. The present study was conducted in Khordha district of Odisha to understand the factual and current needs of the farmers. A total of nine major problems were identified in the village based on a transect walk, focused group discussions and key informants’ interviews. All the identified constraints were categorised using Rank-Based Quotient (RBQ) and Value-Based Index (VBI). The RBQ and VBI results showed the prevalence of brown plant hopper and low profitability from betel vines as the top two challenges faced by the respondents. Pest infestation caused a loss of 60 per cent in the paddy crop with a monetary loss of about ₹5000 per respondent per season. Similarly, there was a monetary loss of about ₹4000 because of low returns to the betel vine crop. Therefore, this study necessitates a comprehensive and collective action plan involving the farmers, Government institutions and agricultural research and extension wings for the overall development of the region.

Author Biographies

SAHEB PAL, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Hazaribagh, Jharkhand, India-825405

Scientist 

SOUMYA MOHAPATRA, ICAR-Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology, Ludhiana, Punjab, India-141004

Scientist 

TANUSHREE SAHOO, ICAR-IIHR, Central Horticultural Experiment Station, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India- 751019

Scientist 

KISHORE CHANDRA SAHOO, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Gogamukh, Lakhimpur, Assam, India-787034

Scientist 

PRAMOD SHELAKE, ICAR-National Research Centre for Banana, Tiruchirapalli, Tamil Nadu, India-620102

Scientist 

KAILASHPATI TRIPATHI, ICAR-National Research Centre on Seed Spices, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India-305006

Scientist 

SWARAJLAXMI NAYAK, ICAR-Directorate of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, Anand, Gujarat-387310

Scientist 

References

Anonymous. 2023. Contribution of Agricultural Sector in GDP. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare. Accessed on 1 Aug. 24 from https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1909213.

Jeet P, Ghodki B M, Amat D, Anuja A R, Balodi R and Upadhyaya A. 2020. Enhancement of land and water productivity through participatory rural appraisal. Journal of AgriSearch 7(4): 234-240.

Karuppasamy P, Arvind M S, Melmurugan G and Selvakumar R. 2020. Socio-economic analysis of Kalyanipuram village of Pudukottai district using Participatory Rural Appraisal by RAWE (Rural Agricultural Work Experience) programme students, ADA&RI (Anbil Dharmalingam Agricultural College and Research Institute, Trichy. Asian J. of Agril. Extension, Economics and Sociology 38(1): 45-50.

Hauke J and Kossowski T. 2011. Comparison of values of Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients on the same sets of data. Quaestiones geographicae 30(2): 87-93.

Hennink M M. 2013. Focus group discussions. Oxford University Press.

Kaleeswaran M, Ramasubramanian M, Velusamy R, Sendhilnathan S, Prabakaran K and Iniya V. 2024. A Rank-Based Quotient Analysis of Constraints Faced by PM-KISAN Beneficiaries across Southern States of India: Key Issues and Policy Implications. J. of Exp. Agri. Intl. 46(10): 400-407.

Reddy K S, Pankaj P K, Reddy N N and Raju N S. 2016. Participatory Rural Appraisal in Drylands: A Holistic Approach for Getting Insight into an Agro-Ecosystem Analysis. J. of Rural Development 35(4): 555-580.

Meena M, Sahu P, Joshi A and Mawlong, I. 2018. Identification and Prioritization of Problems in Integrated Agriculture for Community Development: A Case of Amba Village in Sub-humid Region of Western India. Asian J. of Agril. Extension, Economics & Sociology 24(2): 1-12.

Varshney D, Kumar A and Joshi P K. 2020. Situation assessment of the rural economy amid covid-19 crisis: Evidence from India. International Food Policy Research Institute.

Kumar J K and Ahmad K A. 2025. Analysis of Agricultural Export Performance and Policy Prospects in India: A Two-Decade Review (2003–2023). Asian J. of Agricultural Extension, Economics & Sociology 43(6): 91-98.

Gaur R S, Bunkar R C, Zade S and Sidharth S. 2024. Participatory Extension Approaches: Engaging Farmers as Stakeholders. Chapter book from “Emerging Paradigms in Agricultural Extension and Development, 1.

Amarawat M, Rathore M S and Jhala G P S. 2023. Participatory rural appraisal for identification ethno-veterinary practices among primitive tribal groups of Girwa block, Udaipur, India. Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 54(2): 594-599.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-18