Soil Acidification due to Point Application of Fertilizers through Drip Irrigation
Abstract
An experiment was conducted to know about the effects of point application of fertilizers. Fertigation through drip irrigation was done to tomato and french bean grown under plastic house in two consecutive seasons. Fertilizers were applied at 100%, 75% and 50% of the recommended doses and compared with basal application. Fertigation was also done at three different intervals of application i.e. 2 days, 6 days and 10 days. Urea, Single Super Phosphate and KNO3 was used as source of NPK. The soil pH of polyhouse was 6.51. The irrigation water had the pH of 5.89. Fertilizer applied at the interval of two days at 100% of recommended dose (RD) and 75% of RD to tomato and french beans gives highest yield. After the first crop season of tomato, the pH was found to reduce by 1-1.5 points over the base value from 6.51 to 4.92 in 100 % of RD application irrespective of interval of fertigation. The pH before the 2nd crop was found to be slightly reduced (6.34) over the base value of 6.51. However, after the 2nd crop, the soil pH was found to be reduced and the values were from 5.16 to 5.29. The reduction of soil pH was not as high as in the case of tomato. It indicated that though soil acidity increased due to point application of fertilizers, the increment might have linked to the types of crops and french bean being a leguminous crop had a positive effect against soil acidification.References
Bhat R, Sujatha S, Balasimha D. 2007. Impact of drip fertigation on productivity of arecanut (Areca catechu L.). Agric. Water Mangt. 90 (1-2):101-11.
Bhat R and Sujatha S.2008 Soil fertility and nutrient uptake by arecanut (Areca catechu L.). as affected by level and frequency of fertigation in a laterite soil. Agric. Water Mangt. 96 (3):445-56.
Hanson BR, Simunek J, Hopmans JW. 2006. Evaluation of urea-ammonium-nitrate fertigation with drip irrigation using numerical modeling. Agric Water Mangt. 86 (1-2):102-13.
Haynes RJ. 1988. Comparison of fertigation with broadcast applications of urea N on levels of available soil nutrients and on growth and yield of trickle irrigated peppers. Scientia Horticulturae 35 (3-4):189-98.
Hebber SS, Ramachandrappa BK, Nanjappa HV, Prabhakar M. 2004. Studies on NPK drip fertigation in field grown tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). European J. Agron. 21(1):117-27.
Mahajan G and Singh KG. 2006. Response of green house tomato to irrigation and fertigation. Agric. Water Mangt. 84(1-2):202-6.
Pandey AK, Singh AK, Kumar A and Singh SK.2013.Effect of Drip irrigation, spacing and nitrogen fertigation on productivity of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Envi. Ecol. 31(1): 139-42.
Pandey AK, Singh AK, Singh SK and Kumar A. 2012. Improving strawberry productivity and quality through drip irrigation and polythene mulch in Bihar. Envi. Ecol. 30 (3A): 760-3.
Rajput TBS and Patel N. 2006. Water and nitrate movement in drip irrigated onion under fertigation and irrigation treatments. Agric. Water Mangt. 179 (3):293-311.
Singandhupe RB, Rao GGSN, Patil NG, Brahmanand PS. 2003. Fertigation studies and irrigation scheduling in drip irrigation system in tomato crop (Lycopersicon esculentum L). European J. Agron. 19 (2):327-40.
Singh AK and Kumar Pravesh.2009. Nutrient management in rainfed dryland agro ecosystem in the impending climate change scenario. Agril. Situ. India. 66 (5): 265-70.
Singh AK and Pandey AK. 2014. Dynamics of Anthracnose Disease of Chilli in Responses to Water and Nitrogen Management under Drip and Flood Irrigation. Journal of AgriSearch 1 (3):151-6.
Zotarelli L, Dukes MD, Scholberg JM, Hanselman T Femminella, KL and Carpena RM. 2008. Nitrogen and water use efficiency of zucchini squash for a plastic mulch bed system on a sandy soil. Scientia Horticulturae 116 (1):8-16.
Zotarelli L, Scholberg JM, Dukes MD, Carpena RM and Icerman J.2009. Tomato yield, biomass accumulation, root distribution and irrigation water use efficiency on a sandy soil, as affected by nitrogen rate and irrigation scheduling. Agric. Water Mangt. 96 (1):23-34.
