Actuating forces of frequently operated controls on Indian agricultural tractors
Actuating forces on agricultural tractors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21921/jas.v9i01.9897Keywords:
Tractor, Actuating forces, frequently operated controls, mismatchAbstract
India is the world's largest operator and manufacturer of agricultural tractors. The ergonomic concerns and incorporating the physical and strength capabilities of the Indian operators were neglected while designing and developing the tractors in India. As a result, there was a substantial mismatch between the operators' capabilities and the forces required to operate the tractors' controls. Therefore, this study was planned to determine the actuation forces of frequently operated controls on popular Indian tractors. Ten agricultural tractors of different makes and models in the power range of 23 to 50 kW were selected for the study. The Sushma steering torque measurement system, Novatech pedal force loadcell, and Gear effort transducer were used to measure the actuation force of the controls, steering wheel, clutch and brake pedal, and gear shifter lever, respectively. The actuation forces required to operate the clutch pedal on selected tractors ranged from 130 to 250 N, well below the IS 10703 (1992) limit of 350 N. Except for one tractor, the brake pedal actuation forces observed for the selected tractors varied from 390 to 670 N, well below the recommended limit of 600 N given by IS 10703 (1992). In static conditions, most tractors' steering wheel actuation forces ranged from 210 to 340 N, exceeding or approaching the 250 N limit set by AIS-042 (2004). In dynamic conditions, when tractors were operated at 3 km/h, the actuating forces for the selected tractors ranged from 90-220 N and were well within the AIS-042 limit.
References
AIS-042. 2004. Agricultural tractors- steering effort requirements, Automotive Industry Standard committee India.
Mehta, CR, Pandey MM, Tiwari PS, Gite LP and Khadatkar A. 2011. Tractor controls actuating force limits for Indian operators. Industrial Health49: 523-533.
Mehta CR, Chandel NS, Jena PC, Jha A. 2019. Indian agriculture counting on farmmechanization. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia Africa and Latin America50(1): 84-89.
Gite LP, Agrawal KN, Mehta CR, Potdar RR, Narwariya BS. 2020. Handbook ofErgonomical Design of Agricultural Tools, Equipment and Work Places. Jain Brothers (NewDelhi).
Potdar RR, Mehta CR, Gaikwad BB, Gite LP, Narwariya BS. 2018. Anthropometry andSegmental Proportions of Female Agricultural Workers of Bhopal District of MadhyaPradesh.Agricultural Engineering Today 42(1): 26-37.
Potdar RR, Tiwari PS, Agrawal KN, Jyoti B. and Shukla P. 2021. Intervention of dynapod in cleaner-cum-grader for drudgery reduction: Dynapod in cleaner-cum-grader for drudgery reduction. Journal of AgriSearch 8(1): 35-39.
Shukla P, Mehta CR, Agrawal KN and Potdar RR. 2021. Studies on Operational Frequencies of Controls on Self-propelled Combine Harvesters in India. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 58(2): 101-111.
Senthilkumar T, Chandel NS, Mehta CR and Gholap BS. 2017. Trends of Tractorization in Indian Agriculture. Agricultural Mechanization In Asia Africa And Latin America48(2): 50-59.
BIS. 1992. Agricultural tractor-maximum actuating forces required to operate controls, 10703.