Assessment of physicochemical properties, manurial value and mineral composition of vermicompost prepared from poultry deep litter

Vermicompost Quality from Poultry Deep Litter

Authors

  • KAUSHALENDRA KUMAR Bihar Veterinary College, BASU, Patna
  • CHANDRAHAS College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Kishanganj
  • DURGESH NANDINI Bihar Veterinary College, Patna, India
  • RAVI RANJAN KUMAR SINHA Bihar Veterinary College, Patna
  • SANJAY KUMAR Bihar Veterinary College, Patna
  • KIRTI SAURABH ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21921/jas.v13i01.15275

Keywords:

Vermicomposting, Poultry deep litter, Physicochemical properties, Manurial value, Mineral composition

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the physicochemical properties, manurial value, and mineral composition of vermicompost prepared from poultry deep litter and dry tree leaves. Poultry deep litter was used as the primary substrate, while dried leaves of Ashoka, Peepal, Semal, and Banyan trees were used as carbonaceous material to maintain an optimum C:N ratio of 25:1. Alkaline pretreatment using NaOH (0.2 mol/kg) was applied to enhance decomposition, and earthworms (Perionyx ceylanesis) were used for vermicomposting. The experiment was conducted for 90 days under controlled moisture and pH conditions. Significant changes (P<0.05) were observed in physicochemical parameters during vermicomposting, including reduction in pH, organic matter, crude fibre, and total carbon, along with an increase in total ash and dry matter. Manurial values such as potassium and calcium increased, while nitrogen and phosphorus showed a gradual decline. Mineral elements including zinc, manganese, and iron increased significantly (P<0.05) during the composting period. The results indicate that poultry deep litter combined with dry tree leaves can be efficiently converted into nutrient-rich vermicompost suitable for agricultural use.

Author Biographies

KAUSHALENDRA KUMAR, Bihar Veterinary College, BASU, Patna

Associate Professor

Department of Animal Nutrition

CHANDRAHAS, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Kishanganj

Dean

DURGESH NANDINI, Bihar Veterinary College, Patna, India

M.V.Sc. Scholar,

Department of Animal Nutrition

RAVI RANJAN KUMAR SINHA, Bihar Veterinary College, Patna

Associate Professor

Department of LPM

SANJAY KUMAR, Bihar Veterinary College, Patna

Professor

Department of Animal Nutrition

KIRTI SAURABH, ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, India

Scientist

Division of Land and Water Management 

References

Abd Rashid, Omar F N, Sabri N F, Chuah N F and Samsuddin N Z. 2024.

Manipulating chicken waste for improved vermicomposting substrate. Bioresources Environment 2(3): 155–164.

Adhikari B K, Barrington S, Martinez J and King S. 2009. Effectiveness of three bulking agents for food waste composting. Bioresource Technology 100(12): 2959–2964.

AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

BAHS. 2025. Basic Animal Husbandry Statistics. Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Government of India, New Delhi.

Edwards C A, Arancon N Q, and Sherman R. 2011. Vermiculture technology: Earthworms, organic wastes, and environmental management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.

Gajalakshmi S and Abbasi S A. 2004. Earthworms and vermicomposting: A review. Waste Management 24(4): 305–311.

Joshi T N, Nepali D B, Sah R, Bhattarai T and Midmore D J. 2020. A comparison of composting and vermicomposting for the disposal of poultry waste. Animal Production Science 60(7): 986–992.

Muruganandham M and Parimala S A G. 2018. Utilization of poultry droppings amended with different organic waste in vermiconversion using local earthworms Perionyx ceylanensis. International Journal of Biological Research 3(1): 32–36.

Rathinam A, Raja P and Suganthi P. 2018. Vermicomposting of poultry waste and evaluation of nutrient status of vermicompost. Journal of Environmental Biology 39(3): 381–386.

Snedecor G W and Cochran W G. 1994. Statistical Methods. 9th ed. The Iowa, State University Press, Ames, Iowa.

Srivastava R K and Beohar P A. 2008. Production of Eisenia foetida and vermicompost from poultry waste. Asian Journal of Biological Sciences 3(2): 395–398.

Suthar S. 2009. Vermicomposting of vegetable market waste using Eisenia fetida: Impact of bulking material on earthworm growth and compost quality. Bioresource Technology 100(2): 593–598.

Talapatra S K, Roy S C and Sen K C. 1940. The analysis of mineral constituents in biological materials. I. Estimation of phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium in food stuffs. Indian Journal of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry 10: 243-258.

Thakur R, Chandrahas, Kumar N, Gaur G K, Singh M, Tarafdar A, Verma M R and Tiwari V. 2024. Changes in microbiota and parasitic load of poultry manure undergoing value addition through different techniques for their safe disposal or utilization. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 62(3): 199–205.

Thirunavukkarasu A, Sivashankar R, Nithya R, Sathya A B, Priyadharshini V, Kumar B P, Muthuvenia M and Krishnamoorthy S. 2023. Sustainable organic waste management using vermicomposting: a critical review on the prevailing research gaps and opportunities. Environmental Science: Processes Impacts 25(3): 364-381.

Vandanadevia V S, Aparna S and Meenakshi R P. 2025. Composting – a viable option for converting poultry manure into a nutrient-rich manure. World’s Poultry Science Journal 81(4): 1259–1284.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

Most read articles by the same author(s)